Search results

using.target to detect when in the expression of a using declaration.

Status: Open.

#271 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· Qard opened on Feb 12, 2026

Fundamental Semantic Regression: using introduces unmitigable "Action at a Distance" hazards

Status: Open.

#269 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· ghost opened on Dec 28, 2025

@@dispose alias or wrapper for AbortController.abort

Status: Open.

#265 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· matthieusieben opened on Sep 24, 2025

Is export using should be valid?

Status: Open.

#262 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· alexander-akait opened on Jun 25, 2025

Help me, a confused developer, see what I'm missing

Status: Open.

#260 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· worstpractice opened on Jun 15, 2025

[SUGGESTION]: static run method on DisposableStack / AsyncDisposableStack

Status: Open.

#257 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· lifaon74 opened on Feb 25, 2025

Can the variable be assigned?

Status: Open.

#254 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· Arlen22 opened on Jan 21, 2025

A somewhat frustrating situation when leveraging DisposableStack.use (etc.) in nested callbacks

Status: Open.

#253 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· chenxinyanc opened on Jan 20, 2025

Suggestion: add using fields to classes that are auto-disposed on @@dispose

Status: Open.

#250 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· dead-claudia opened on Dec 23, 2024

Is for (using of = obj;;); valid syntax?

Status: Open.

#248 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· arai-a opened on Dec 20, 2024

Disposal should be based on a DAG, not a stack (e.g. AsyncDisposableDag)

Status: Open.

#246 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· alexweej opened on Nov 7, 2024

implement features required for structured concurrency

Status: Open.

#245 In tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management;

· graingert opened on Oct 11, 2024