remove special handling of inverse boolean flags#475
Closed
afeld wants to merge 2 commits intorails:masterfrom
Closed
remove special handling of inverse boolean flags#475afeld wants to merge 2 commits intorails:masterfrom
afeld wants to merge 2 commits intorails:masterfrom
Conversation
|
I just ran into this when wrapping an AWS CLI command that had a In certain cases, it would be nice if there was a way to get both through a specified type (e.g. |
Member
|
See #473 (comment) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #417 (comment).
This is a superset of #473, removing all special handling of boolean flags generating/parsing the inverse. It certainly makes the behavior more straightforward (no magic flags), though I realize checks for "negative" flags (like
options[:no_public] == true) become a little more confusing. Thoughts? Also, I'm new to this codebase, so while all tests are passing, would love another set of 👀 to ensure I got everything.