Skip to content

Adding re-try RFQ negotiation on SCID collsion#2040

Open
sergey3bv wants to merge 2 commits intolightninglabs:mainfrom
sergey3bv:feat/re-try-rfq-negotiation
Open

Adding re-try RFQ negotiation on SCID collsion#2040
sergey3bv wants to merge 2 commits intolightninglabs:mainfrom
sergey3bv:feat/re-try-rfq-negotiation

Conversation

@sergey3bv
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Should solve #1735

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the robustness of the Request for Quote (RFQ) system by introducing an automatic retry mechanism for buy negotiations. Specifically, it addresses scenarios where a Short Channel ID (SCID) alias collision occurs, allowing the system to gracefully re-attempt the negotiation with a fresh RFQ ID rather than failing outright. This change improves the reliability of asset trading by making the negotiation process more resilient to transient alias conflicts.

Highlights

  • SCID Alias Collision Retry: Implemented a retry mechanism for RFQ buy negotiations when a Short Channel ID (SCID) alias collision is detected, preventing critical failures and allowing the negotiation to proceed with a new RFQ ID.
  • Error Handling Refinement: Introduced specific error handling for SCID alias collisions, distinguishing them as recoverable errors that trigger a retry, while other alias-related errors remain critical.
  • New Helper Functions: Added isAliasCollisionErr to identify alias collision errors and retryBuyNegotiation to re-initiate the buy negotiation process.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Included new unit tests to cover the alias collision detection, retry logic, and the distinction between recoverable and critical alias errors.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a retry mechanism for RFQ negotiation in the event of an SCID alias collision, which is a solid improvement for the robustness of the system. The implementation correctly identifies collision errors and triggers a new negotiation. The accompanying tests are thorough and cover the new logic well. My feedback focuses on minor code style improvements for error and log messages to better align with the repository's style guide, enhancing readability and maintainability.

@sergey3bv sergey3bv force-pushed the feat/re-try-rfq-negotiation branch from c1b179c to d0f3120 Compare March 24, 2026 14:31
@lightninglabs-deploy
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sergey3bv, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 🆕 New

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants