Skip to content

docs: RBAC role-scope binding redesign review#10981

Draft
fregataa wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/rbac-redesign-review
Draft

docs: RBAC role-scope binding redesign review#10981
fregataa wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/rbac-redesign-review

Conversation

@fregataa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Review notes for the docs/rbac-role-scope-binding-redesign branch (BEP-1008/1012/1048)
  • Documents resolved decisions: project membership via role-scope binding only, scope constraint removal
  • Lists open issues: schema defect (unique constraint), functional gaps (state/expires_at removal, superadmin), performance notes

Related

  • Depends on: docs/rbac-role-scope-binding-redesign branch

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Review of the docs/rbac-role-scope-binding-redesign branch changes,
documenting resolved decisions and open issues for schema, functionality,
and performance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size:L 100~500 LoC label Apr 12, 2026
@jopemachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR 37d665d is merged, is this PR also needs to be merged?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:L 100~500 LoC

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants