Skip to content

Add foam-notes agent skill recipe#1585

Open
Hegghammer wants to merge 1 commit intofoambubble:mainfrom
Hegghammer:main
Open

Add foam-notes agent skill recipe#1585
Hegghammer wants to merge 1 commit intofoambubble:mainfrom
Hegghammer:main

Conversation

@Hegghammer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds a new recipe describing foam-notes, an AgentSkills-compatible skill that lets AI coding assistants (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, etc.) work with Foam note collections.
  • Adds a wikilink entry in the Workflow section of recipes.md.

Files changed

  • docs/user/recipes/foam-notes-agent-skill.md (new)
  • docs/user/recipes/recipes.md (one line added)

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Foam Notes Agent Skill

This #recipe describes how to use [foam-notes](https://github.com/Hegghammer/foam-notes), an [AgentSkills](https://agentskills.io/specification)-compatible skill that lets AI coding assistants work with your Foam notes.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please put a warning here about prompt injection and the security implications of using 3rd party skills?
Users should review the skill files/scripts before adopting them


## Features

- Create, edit, delete, and rename notes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's too bad that you can't leverage any of the Foam code for those python scripts. Basically you are replicating some of Foam's features, whereas if you were to use foam-core that wouldn't be necessary. We don't currently publish foam-core as a standalone library, so I see why you did that.
I would put a note about that though here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants