Elephant-shed is now using pgadmin instead of omnidb, as omnidb isn't supported any more#34
Elephant-shed is now using pgadmin instead of omnidb, as omnidb isn't supported any more#34
Conversation
… supported any more
mbanck-cd
left a comment
mbanck-cd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are some omnidb remnants still lying around I think.
The other question is: We create an admin (super-)user, this one could be used by pgadmin4 to login via a socket; but pgadmin4 runs via apache2 as www-data. Is there maybe a way to make apache2 run as admin instead?
| elephant-shed-cockpit, | ||
| elephant-shed-grafana, | ||
| elephant-shed-omnidb <!stretch>, | ||
| elephant-shed-pgadmin, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Last time, the package was called elephant-shed-pgadmin4, and this is how it is called upstream as well (pgadmin4-web), although they seem to be using "pgAdmin" and "pgAdmin 4" interchangeably nowadays.
But I still think we should go with pgadmin4 again.
| pgadmin4-web, | ||
| ${misc:Depends}, | ||
| Description: PostgreSQL dashboard -- OmniDB integration | ||
| Description: PostgreSQL dashboard -- Pgadmin integration |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Official wording seems to be "pgAdmin", not "Pgadmin"
| case $1 in | ||
| configure) | ||
| echo "Configure pgadmin to use basicauth as authentication" | ||
| sed -i 's/^MASTER_PASSWORD_REQUIRED.*/MASTER_PASSWORD_REQUIRED = False/g' /usr/pgadmin4/web/config.py |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So this lets the user login to pgadmin without having to type another password, right?
I think that is ok, but we probably need to check that this does not mean other people can just login from remote?
|
Also, the ansible module in |
2 participants
… supported any more