-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
Add FERC1 Depreciation Changes table (Schedule 332) #5112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
cmgosnell
wants to merge
5
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
ferc1-depreciation-changes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+58
−4
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8e972bb
early early transform new ferc1 depreciation table
cmgosnell fcaf50e
enable main transform
cmgosnell ffa9045
Merge branch 'main' into ferc1-depreciation-changes
cmgosnell b6597ff
add string normalization
cmgosnell 821927e
Merge branch 'main' into ferc1-depreciation-changes
cmgosnell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i lightly wanna rename the 219 to accumulated depreciation bc well thats what ferc calls it. but bc we have the sched### at the end we could have two changes without renaming tables willy nilly ( which ya know no one really likes )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh noooooo
so we called sched 219 "yearly depreciation changes"
but now we want to add sched 336 which is actually called "depreciation changes" by ferc?
so the choices are
i think you're right that the third one is definitely bad
but i would actually go with option 2 here? we can mea culpa the old bad naming decision in the release notes, and then we'd hew more closely to ferc terminology, which is something that comes up occasionally in the ecosystem survey as something we should fix anyway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
totally agree.. In an ideal world we would have a deprecation warning for
core_ferc1__yearly_depreciation_changes_sched219and change this tocore_ferc1__yearly_accumulated_depreciation_sched219(bc the table is called: ACCUMULATED PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION OF ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANT (Account 108))