-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
lib: Pass absolute authfile path when pulling LBIs #1852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cgwalters
merged 2 commits into
bootc-dev:main
from
csssuf:jmf/lbi-authfile-absolute-path
Dec 16, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this will work because the fd should have
O_CLOEXECand won't be passed to the child by default.The general pattern we use here instead is using https://docs.rs/cap-std-ext/latest/cap_std_ext/cmdext/trait.CapStdExtCommandExt.html#tymethod.take_fd_n
In fact we should just make this code identical to the one in containers-image-proxy-rs: https://github.com/bootc-dev/containers-image-proxy-rs/blob/b5e0861ad5065f47eaf9cda0d48da3529cc1bc43/src/imageproxy.rs#L310
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't believe we rely on passing it to the child here - we only use the fd in the current process to look up the absolute path through
/proc, and just pass the path to the child since podman's--authfileoption expects a path.Using
/prochere does feel a little hacky, but as far as I can tellcap_std::fs::Diris very deliberate in not exposing the underlying path, but open to other suggestions here - would copying the contents as in the imageproxy implementation be preferable to resolving the absolute path this way?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pushed a followup commit here, can you review it?