Skip to content

HBASE-30013 Update documentation links to point to new docs (#7963)#7982

Open
PDavid wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-3from
PDavid:HBASE-30013-doc-links-branch-3
Open

HBASE-30013 Update documentation links to point to new docs (#7963)#7982
PDavid wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-3from
PDavid:HBASE-30013-doc-links-branch-3

Conversation

@PDavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@PDavid PDavid commented Mar 26, 2026

A lot of source files in our repo still has links to book.html which will not be updated anymore. Replaced them with links to the new docs. Also changed http in links to https.

Signed-off-by: Xiao Liu liuxiaocs@apache.org
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang zhangduo@apache.org
(cherry picked from commit 9e0f008)

@PDavid
HBASE-30013 Update documentation links to point to new docs (apache#7963
992fd2f 
)

A lot of source files in our repo still has links to book.html which will not be updated anymore. Replaced them with links to the new docs. Also changed http in links to https.

Signed-off-by: Xiao Liu <liuxiaocs@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <zhangduo@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9e0f008)
@PDavid PDavid self-assigned this Mar 26, 2026
@PDavid PDavid added the backport This PR is a back port of some issue or issues already committed to master label Mar 26, 2026
@PDavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PDavid commented Mar 26, 2026

This is kinda a backport of #7963 to branch-3. The patch did not apply cleanly so I had to resolve some conflicts.

I think it makes sense to point to new documentation in branch-3 because we don't host a versioned 3.x documentation on the website.

For 2.x branches we host versioned documentation on the site, so I guess backporting to branch-2, branch-2.6 and branch-2.5 does not make sense.

What do you all think?

@PDavid PDavid marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 12:03
@PDavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PDavid commented Mar 26, 2026

Some tests failed in the PR build but I think they are unrelated.

@PDavid PDavid requested a review from Apache9 March 26, 2026 12:43
@liuxiaocs7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liuxiaocs7 commented Mar 27, 2026

Hi, @PDavid, seems we don't have a versioned ref guide for branch-2.5 and branch-2.6?

image image image

@PDavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PDavid commented Mar 27, 2026

Hi, @PDavid, seems we don't have a versioned ref guide for branch-2.5 and branch-2.6?

image image image

Hi @liuxiaocs7,
Yes, exactly. There was a point when the community decided to only keep having the ref guide maintained on master.
See:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Apache9 Apache9 Apache9 approved these changes

Assignees

@PDavid PDavid

Labels

backport This PR is a back port of some issue or issues already committed to master

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@PDavid @liuxiaocs7 @Apache9