Conversation
- ADR-029: pending file + 現セッション起動方式の設計書新設 (schema v1 / 状態遷移 / 競合ポリシー / 破損耐性 / additionalContext フォーマット) - ADR-014: 将来の展望に ADR-029 リンク追加。自動起動は選択肢 3 維持を明記 - ADR-013: 将来の展望セクション新設、ai ステップの実装方式を ADR-029 に委譲 - CLAUDE.md: ADR リストに ADR-029 追加 - docs/todo.md: 「マージ後フィードバックの定常化」を 1-A〜1-F に分割 本 PR は 1-A (docs のみ)。1-B (CLI) / 1-C (hook) / 1-D (有効化) / 1-E (skill) は後続。
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 46 minutes and 24 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughADR-029を新規追加し、pending-fileベースのpost-merge feedback自動トリガー機構を設計しました。cli-merge-pipelineのAI処理が Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant CLI as cli-merge-pipeline
participant FS as .claude/post-merge-feedback-pending.json
participant StopHook as hooks-stop-feedback-dispatch
participant Claude as Claude (main conversation / skill runner)
CLI->>FS: atomically write pending JSON (status: pending)
Note right of FS: file: pending → dispatched → consumed
StopHook->>FS: read pending file on Stop
alt pending found
StopHook->>FS: update status -> dispatched
StopHook-->>Claude: return additionalContext to request /post-merge-feedback
Claude->>Claude: run /post-merge-feedback skill within main session
Claude-->>StopHook: skill completed (consume)
StopHook->>FS: mark status -> consumed (or delete after TTL)
else no pending / already dispatched
StopHook-->>CLI: no-op / warn
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/adr/adr-029-post-merge-feedback-auto-trigger.md`:
- Around line 142-159: The ADR currently asserts that atomic rename via
std::fs::rename holds on POSIX/Windows (line referencing
"hooks-stop-feedback-dispatch" and "std::fs::rename"), but std::fs::rename does
not universally guarantee atomic overwrite on all Windows versions; update the
ADR text to qualify this claim, reference the Windows 10 1607+/FileRenameInfoEx
vs fallback FileRenameInfo behavior, and add an action item in task 1-B to (a)
verify target Windows versions/runtime behavior at implementation time, and (b)
specify a fallback strategy (e.g., safe delete+rename fallback or use
ReplaceFile/FileRenameInfoEx via platform API) if atomic rename cannot be relied
upon.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 602b32b7-5449-47d4-a982-f512163b0758
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
CLAUDE.mddocs/adr/adr-013-merge-pipeline.mddocs/adr/adr-014-post-merge-feedback.mddocs/adr/adr-029-post-merge-feedback-auto-trigger.mddocs/todo.md
…sk 1-B に検証項目追加 (CodeRabbit PR#69)
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/todo.md`:
- Around line 29-43: The TODO shows "現在地: 未着手" while the PR completed task 1-A;
update the checklist in docs/todo.md so it reflects that 1-A is done by marking
the specific item related to ADR-029 / "1-A" as completed (check the bullet
under `docs/adr/adr-029-post-merge-feedback-auto-trigger.md` and change its
state from 未着手/unchecked to 完了/checked or remove the outdated "未着手" header to
match the repo's Line 3 operation rule), ensuring the ADR-029, ADR-014/013
update bullets and CLAUDE.md entry remain present and consistent.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ea8f02f6-c62f-4624-9342-8967810b97ab
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/adr/adr-029-post-merge-feedback-auto-trigger.mddocs/todo.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/adr/adr-029-post-merge-feedback-auto-trigger.md
…abbit PR#69 Minor)
1 participant
Summary
/post-merge-feedbackskill を自動発火する設計を確定 (schema v1 / 状態遷移 / 競合ポリシー / 破損耐性 / additionalContext フォーマット)[[merge_pipeline.post_steps]]のtype = "ai"実装方式を ADR-029 に委譲Context
Why: ADR-014 の
/post-merge-feedbackskill は明示呼び出し依存で、呼び忘れによりフィードバックが得られないケースが運用上発生していた。自動起動を追加したいが、exe からclaude -pで新規 session を spawn する案 (選択肢 1) はセッション知見を失うため ADR-014 で却下済み。ADR-014 選択肢 3 (skill はメイン会話内で実行) を維持したまま自動化する具体仕様が必要だった。Trigger: docs/todo.md「マージ後フィードバックの定常化 (post-merge-feedback 自動起動)」task 1-A。全体設計 (pending file + 現セッション起動) は事前の採用済フィードバック論点で確定済み (多重実行耐性 / atomic write / 競合ポリシー / additionalContext 構造化 /
run_steps後方互換)。Scope decision: 本 PR は docs のみに限定 (1-A)。実装 (CLI: 1-B / hook: 1-C / 有効化: 1-D / skill: 1-E) は並行可能な別 PR に分離し、設計確定を先行させる。
Validation
verdict=APPROVE(1 iteration, 3m 22s, 2026-04-23T04:34:54Z)owner_repoの文字列検証を入れると newline injection 防御で堅牢)References
Summary by CodeRabbit