Extend audit detail via new key attribute in rule language. Add support for auditing implicit policy matches.#692
Open
aje220 wants to merge 2 commits intoUSBGuard:mainfrom
Open
Extend audit detail via new key attribute in rule language. Add support for auditing implicit policy matches.#692aje220 wants to merge 2 commits intoUSBGuard:mainfrom
aje220 wants to merge 2 commits intoUSBGuard:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello all
New features in this pull request:
By extending the rule language to allow an optional key, you can more easily audit systems to see which policy events are triggered by which rule.
Furthermore, if no rule exists at all, you can enable the new RuleSourceLogging option inside usbguard-daemon.conf, and differentiate between implicit and explicit policy rules.
Thank you
Alex