-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
Improve how large molecules are automatically cut during mechanism generation #2660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
donerancl
wants to merge
24
commits into
ReactionMechanismGenerator:main
from
donerancl:improve_auto_cut
Closed
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
24 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
22b2692
resolved merge conflict in yml.py
donerancl 14bd3e5
fixed bugs in fragment reattachment notebook, fragment_utils, cantera…
donerancl 2edd657
Update fragment.py (typo)
donerancl a493353
set size_threshold default to zero
donerancl 6ba1c30
added function that finds all possible partial reatt rxns and adds to…
donerancl 96aa9b2
typo
donerancl 31d9b12
commented cutting label logic
donerancl 4dc438a
Apply suggestions from code review - formatting, small things
donerancl 3559562
added docstring to merge_fragment_a_to_cutting_label_on_b
donerancl 69142c4
remove unnecessary try-except
donerancl 164192d
moved model into its own file in ipython
donerancl 4b15850
Added missing entries to KineticsDB local context
jonwzheng 26be15c
Added missing entries to KineticsDB local context
ssun30 921105f
Extra debugging message for loading a KineticsDB
ssun30 f72d6a1
Improved how database library labels are created.
ssun30 1b84b0f
incorporating changes from JB review
donerancl 5bf5e03
removing leftover debugging statements
donerancl 9cea759
notebook
donerancl c4092d7
added docstrings to many fragment_utils functions
donerancl 139ef68
reverted is_carbon
donerancl a141f11
Define e_electronic_with_corrections, zpe before e0 conditions
alongd da1703d
If E0 is not None (e.g., given directly by the user), use it
alongd 79cc842
Report e_elect + ZPE in SI only if they're not None
alongd 9724157
Added an example for inputting E0 directly
alongd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for the sake of reproducibility, let's change this to:
at least, it should look something like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! I changed over to
default_rng, usingrng.integers(low=0, high=2, size=1)which seems to be the equivalent to randint.