Skip to content

identical agilent v3 and v4 resources #345

@anoronh4

Description

@anoronh4

We found in roslin_resources.json that certain resources were identical between AgilentExon_51MB_b37_v3 and Agilent_v4_51MB_Human. The baits files had the exact positional info and the targets files also had the exact same positional info. For example:

## Targets
$ cut -f1-3 /juno/work/ci/resources/roslin_resources/targets/Agilent_v4_51MB_Human/b37/Agilent_v4_51MB_Human_b37_targets.bed  | md5sum
e3cc9b442b6cd483adb840b80af5bc58  -
$ cut -f 1-3 /juno/work/ci/resources/roslin_resources/targets/AgilentExon_51MB_b37_v3/b37/AgilentExon_51MB_b37_v3_targets.bed | md5sum 
e3cc9b442b6cd483adb840b80af5bc58  -
## Baits
$ cut -f1-3 /juno/work/ci/resources/roslin_resources/targets/Agilent_v4_51MB_Human/b37/Agilent_v4_51MB_Human_b37_baits.bed  | md5sum
facb4d6e88281100d5e7f6ec72a3a94f  -
$ cut -f 1-3 /juno/work/ci/resources/roslin_resources/targets/AgilentExon_51MB_b37_v3/b37/AgilentExon_51MB_b37_v3_baits.bed | md5sum 
facb4d6e88281100d5e7f6ec72a3a94f  -

We thought this was strange because the versions should certainly have different positions, and we have double-checked by downloading the bed files directly from agilent.

Would it be possible to know more info about how the resources were generated, and if there is a potential mix-up in the bed files?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions