Status of testing of Apache Airflow CTL (airflowctl) 0.1.3rc2

[bugraoz93]

Body

Body

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest airflowctl distribution release.
Could you please help us test the RC versions of the airflowctl?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify AirflowCTL (airflowctl) by contributors

Please let us know in the comments whether the issue is addressed.

These are airflowctl that require testing, as there were some substantial changes introduced:

AirflowCTL (airflowctl) 0.1.3rc2

• Add airflowctl auth token command to print JWT access tokens (#62843): @dheerajturaga
• Send limit parameter in execute_list server requests (#63048): @Leondon9
• Add --action-on-existing-key to pools import and connections import (#62702): @Leondon9
• Run test-coverage when airflowctl command has any change (#63216): @bugraoz93
• Add retry mechanism to airflowctl and remove flaky integration mark (#63016): @bugraoz93
• Expose timetable_partitioned in UI API (#62777): @uranusjr
• airflowctl auth login: prompt for credentials interactively when none are provided (#62549): @dheerajturaga
• Fix airflowctl pools export ignoring --output table/yaml/plain (#62665): @Leondon9
• Increase version airflowctl (#62255): @bugraoz93
• Fix airflowctl connections import failure when JSON omits extra field (#62662): @Leondon9
• airflow-ctl: Add coverage tests for console formatting output (#62627): @Leondon9
• CI: Upgrade important CI environment (#62610): @potiuk
• Fix all build-system/requires including transitive dependencies (#62570): @potiuk
• Clean up stale Python 3.9 workaround in airflow-ctl CLI config parser (#62206): @haseebmalik18
• feat(airflowctl): support on headless environments (#62217): @ahidalgob
• Add DagRunType for asset materializations (#62276): @guan404ming
• Implement backfill for partitioned Dags (#61464): @dstandish
• Amend compatibility issues for airflowctl (#63388): @bugraoz93

All users involved in the PRs:
@dheerajturaga @Leondon9 @bugraoz93 @uranusjr @potiuk @haseebmalik18 @ahidalgob @guan404ming @dstandish

Committer

• I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.

[uranusjr]

I don’t think #62777 would actually affect airflowctl funtionally (since it does not use the new field)